Skip to main content
Download PDF
  • Research Article
  • Open access
  • Published:

Synthesis and biological profile of substituted benzimidazoles

Chemistry Central Journal volume 12, Article number: 125 (2018) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

A series of benzimidazole derivatives was developed and its chemical scaffolds were authenticated by NMR, IR, elemental analyses and physicochemical properties. The synthesized compounds were screened for their antimicrobial and antiproliferative activities.

Results and discussion

The synthesized benzimidazole compounds were evaluated for their antimicrobial activity using the tube dilution method and were found to exhibit good antimicrobial potential against selected Gram negative and positive bacterial and fungal species. The compounds were also assessed for their anticancer activity exhibited using the SRB assay and were found to elicit antiproliferative activity against MCF7 breast cancer cell line, which was comparable to the standard drug.

Conclusion

Antimicrobial screening results indicated that compounds 1, 2 and 19 to be promising antimicrobial agents against selected microbial species and comparable to standard drugs which included norfloxacin and fluconazole. The anticancer screening results revealed that compounds, 12, 21, 22 and 29 to show the highest activity against MCF7 and their IC50 values were more potent than 5-fluorouracil.

Background

The emergence of antibiotic-resistant microorganisms such as fluoroquinolone-resistant Escherichia coli, Streptococcus pneumonia, carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumonia, vancomycin-resistant enterococci and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus is becoming a serious health issue worldwide. There is a critical need to develop new chemotherapeutic agents with different mechanism of action [1].

Cancer is a deadly disease prevalent in both the developing as well as the developed countries. In spite of significant improvements in recognition and treatment of cancer, the incidence of certain types of malignancy is still on the rise. Current treatments such as cytotoxic chemotherapy and radiotherapy yielded only transient therapeutic aids that are accompanied by severe adverse effects. This is due to their toxic effects against normal growing cells. Concerted effort is, therefore, required to eliminate or at least reduce these incidences significantly [2].

Recent findings suggest that substituted benzimidazole derivatives possess potential chemotherapeutic activity with reduced toxic effects. Antibacterial activity of substituted benzimidazole derivatives can be explained by their competition with purines, an integral part of bacterial strain, resulting in inhibition of bacterial nucleic acids and proteins synthesis [3]. Compounds containing benzimidazole moiety such as thiabendazole, parbendazole, mebendazole, albendazole, cambendazole and flubendazole had also been reported for their antihelminthic activity. Similarly, the proton pump inhibitors, omeprazole, lansoprazole, rabeprazole, pantoprazole, had been reported for their use in the management of acid related disorders. In fact, benzimidazole derivatives had found their applications as antioxidant [4], antimicrobial [5], antihelmintic [6], anticancer [7], antiviral [8], antiallergic [9], antiarthritic [10] and anti-mycobacterial agents [11].

In light of above, the present study was undertaken to synthesise and evaluate the antimicrobial and anticancer potentials of substituted benzimidazole derivatives.

Results and discussion

Chemistry

Target compounds (1–30) were synthesized by following procedure outlined in Scheme 1. The physicochemical data of the target compounds are presented in Table 1. The synthesized compounds were evaluated on the basis of spectral analysis: IR, NMR and Mass and elemental analyses which were in full agreement with their proposed molecular structures. The formation of Schiff bases is confirmed by the presence of N=CH str., at around 1560 cm−1 in the IR spectra of synthesized compounds (1–11). Asym str., at around 1550 cm−1 indicated the presence of aromatic nitro group in 5, 7, 13, 14, 16, 21-28 compounds. The presence of C–O–C str., of aralkyl showed methoxy group in 3, 9, 11, 13, 17–20, 27 compounds. The C–H str., at 1727 cm−1 confirmed the aliphatic aldehyde group in 10, 14 and 15 compounds. Furthermore, the appearance of C=O str., at 1660 cm−1 and the absence of NH str., of imidazole at 3400 cm−1 confirmed the synthesis of methanone derivatives (12–30). The multiplet corresponds to 6.697–7.823 δ ppm confirmed the presence of aromatic protons of aryl nucleus and benzimidazole. The appearance of singlet at around 9.580 δ ppm confirmed the Schiff bases (N=CH–). The singlet peak at 3.426 δ ppm indicated the presence of dimethyl group in compounds, 1, 6, 22, 29 and 30. The doublet peak observed at 1.273–1.276 δ ppm which confirmed the presence of aliphatic methyl group in the synthesized compounds, 8, 12 and 15. The multiplet showed at 1.243–2.496 δ ppm confirmed the presence of CH2 chain of palmitoyl group in the structure of compounds (20, 28 and 29). Further confirmation was made on the basis of 13C-NMR and MS spectral analyses. The results of C, H, N analysis are within limits of ± 0.3%.

Scheme 1
scheme 1

Synthesis of benzimidazole derivatives (1–30). Reaction condition: Step i: 2-Aminobenzimidazole, substituted aldehyde, ethanol, glacial acetic acid, reflux for 4–5 h (RT), Step ii: Schiff’s base, different acylchlorides, dimethylformamide, triethylamine, stir for 24 h (RT)

Full size image
Table 1 Physicochemical characteristic of the synthesized compounds
Full size table

Anticancer activity

The synthesized benzimidazole derivatives were screened for their anticancer activity against MCF7 (ATCC HTB-22), an oestrogen receptor positive human breast adeno-carcinoma cell line. Anticancer screening results (Table 2) indicated that compound 22 (IC50 = 0.9 µM) was found to be the most potent when compared to the standard drug, 5-fluorouracil (IC50 = 35.4 µM). Other compounds which included 12, 21 and 29 also exhibited more potent antiproliferative results (IC50 = 7.0, 5.4 and 5.5 µM, respectively) when compared to the standard drug. These compounds may be used as drug leads for discovery of new anticancer agents.

Table 2 Anticancer screening results of synthesized compounds
Full size table

Antimicrobial activity

Antimicrobial activity results (Table 3) indicated that the compounds possessed good antimicrobial activity against the tested bacterial and fungal strains. Compound 1 showed good antibacterial activity against E. coli (MICec = 5.4 µM) and B. subtilis (MICbs = 10.7 µM), whereas compound 19 was found to be more potent against S. aureus (MICsa= 12.4 µM). The reference drug, norfloxacin, yielded MIC of 4.7 µM against the tested microorganisms. The antifungal activity results indicated that compound 2 showed good activity against C. albicans (MICca = 5.4 µM. Compound 19, on the other hand, was the most potent antifungal agent against A. niger (MICan = 3.1 µM) in comparison to fluconazole (MIC = 5.0 µM), the reference drug. Thus, compound 19 may serve as a potential lead compound for the design of novel antifungal agents.

Table 3 Antimicrobial activity of synthesized compounds
Full size table

Structure activity relationship

The following structure activity relationship may be drawn from the antimicrobial and anticancer activities of the benzimidazole derivatives (Fig. 1):

Fig. 1
figure 1

Structural requirements for antimicrobial and anticancer activity of synthesized benzimidazole derivatives

Full size image

  • It has been noticed that the antibacterial activity of Schiff bases against E. coli enhanced due to the presence of vinyl group between benzimidazole amine and N-benzylidene moiety and the substitution of electron releasing group at phenyl nucleus as in the compound 1 and the same moiety improved anticancer activity of methanone derivatives as in compound 22.

  • The electron donating group placed at phenyl ring attached to N-alylidene/arylidene moiety along with presence of electron withdrawing group on phenyl ring attached to methanone moiety improved antibacterial and antifungal activity of synthesized benzimidazole derivatives against bacterial and fungal strains as in compound 19.

Experimental

Materials and methods

All the laboratory reagents were procured from Sigma Aldrich and were used without any purification. Melting points were determined on Sonar melting point apparatus in an open capillary tube and are uncorrected. Purity of the compound was ascertained by commercialized (E-Merck Kieselgel 60 F254) TLC plates. The Infrared spectrum was recorded in KBr discs on a Shimadzu-FTIR 8400S spectrometer (νmax in cm−1). Proton and

13C NMR spectra of the synthesized compounds were recorded on Bruker Advance-II 400 NMR spectrometer with DMSO as a solvent and the chemical shift data were expressed as delta values related to tetramethylsilane. Mass spectra were recorded using Waters, Q-TOF micromass spectrometer.

Procedure for the title compounds (1–11)

2-Aminobenzimidazole (0.01 mol) was refluxed with different substituted aromatic aldehyde (0.01 mol) in ethanol (20 ml) for 4–5 h (RT) in presence of glacial acetic acid (few drops). Then the reaction mixture was allowed to cool at RT and the precipitated compound was filtered and dried [12].

Synthesis of 2-(alkyl/arylideneamino)-1H-benzo[d]imidazol-1-yl-alkyl/aryl-methanones (12–30)

Compound of Schiff’s bases (1–11) (0.005 mol) were stirred at RT with different acylchlorides (0.005 mol) in dimethylformamide for 24 h with the addition of small amount of triethylamine. The resulting reaction mixture was precipitated using ice cold water and the crude product was filtered through a vacuum pump, washed with cold water, dried and recrystallized using rectified spirit [13].

Spectral data of synthesized compounds

(E)-N-((E)-3-(4-(Dimethylamino)phenyl)allylidene)-1H-benzo[d]imidazol-2-amine (1)

IR (KBr cm−1): 1550 (N=CH str.), 3475 (N–H str.), 1431 (Ar., C=C str.), 1253 (C–N str.), 1300 (–N(CH3)2 str); 1H NMR (DMSO): 9.557–9.575 (d, 1H, N=CH), 6.646–6.714 (d, 1H, –CH=CH), 6.416–7.614 (m, 8H, ArH), 3.426 (s, 6H, (CH3)2); 13C NMR (DMSO): 40, 115, 119, 123, 127, 135, 138, 148, 159, 162; MS: m/z = 291.12 (M+ +1).

(E)-1-(((1H-Benzo[d]imidazol-2-yl)imino)methyl)naphthalen-2-ol (2)

IR (KBr cm−1): 3066 (N–H str., of imidazole), 3012 (C–H aromatic ring str.), 1442 (Ar., C=C str.), 1550 (N=CH str.), 1253 (C–N str.), 3518 (O–H str.); 1H NMR (DMSO): 10.295 (s, 1H, N=CH), 7.096–8.108 (m, 10H, ArH), 4.481 (s, 1H, OH), 10.809 (s,1H, NH of imidazole); 13C NMR (DMSO): 115, 118, 123, 127, 128, 129, 132, 135, 138, 159, 162; MS: m/z = 288.39 (M+ +1).

(E)-N-(3,4-Dimethoxybenzylidene)-1H-benzo[d]imidazol-2-amine (3)

IR (KBr cm−1): 3410 (N–H str.), 3058 (Ar., C–H str.), 1542 (C=C str.), 1610 (N=CH str.), 2827 (Ar., OCH3 str.); 1H NMR (DMSO): 9.487 (s, 1H, N=CH), 6.982–7.849 (m, 7H, ArH), 10.452 (s, 1H, NH of imidazole) 3.502 (s, 6H, (OCH3)2); 13C NMR (DMSO): 56, 115, 123, 127, 138, 152, 159, 162; MS: m/z = 282.14 (M+ +1).

(E)-4-(((1H-Benzo[d]imidazol-2-yl)imino)methyl)phenol (4)

IR (KBr cm−1): 3440 (N–H str.), 3063 (Ar., C–H str.), 1537 (C=C str.), 1613 (N=CH str.), 3452 (O–H str.); 1H NMR (DMSO): 9.582 (s, 1H, N=CH), 7.106–8.367 (m, 8H, ArH), 10.809 (s, 1H, NH of imidazole); 13C NMR (DMSO): 115, 117, 123, 126, 129, 131, 138, 159, 162; MS: m/z = 238.17 (M+ +1).

(E)-N-(4-Nitrobenzylidene)-1H-benzo[d]imidazol-2-amine (5)

IR (KBr cm−1): 3240 (N–H str., of imidazole ring), 2974 (C–H aromatic ring str.), 1465 (Ar., C=C str.), 1550 (N=CH str.), 1548 (Ar–C–NO2, asym str.); 1H NMR (DMSO): 9.550 (s, 1H, N=CH), 7.103–8.105 (m, 4H, ArH), 8.116–8.376 (d, 4H, Ar-NO2), 12.73 (s, 1H, NH of imidazole); 13C NMR (DMSO): 115, 120, 123, 130, 138, 149, 159, 162; MS: m/z = 267.26 (M+ +1).

(E)-N-(4-(Dimethylamino)benzylidene)-1H-benzo[d]imidazol-2-amine (6)

IR (KBr cm−1): 1550 (N=CH str.), 3374 (N–H str.), 1462 (Ar., C=C str.), 1298 (C–N str. –N(CH3)2); 1H NMR (DMSO): 9.206 (s, 1H, N=CH), 6.697–7.823 (m, 8H, ArH), 3.043 (s, 6H, (CH3)2), 12.42 (s, 1H, NH of imidazole); 13C NMR (DMSO): 40, 115, 123, 138, 159, 162; MS: m/z = 265.35 (M+ +1).

(E)-N-(3-Nitrobenzylidene)-1H-benzo[d]imidazol-2-amine (7)

IR (KBr cm−1): 3428 (N–H str.), 3068 (Ar., C–H str.), 1531 (C=C str.), 1618 (C=N str.), 1547 (Ar-NO2 str.); 1H NMR (DMSO): 9.515 (s, 1H, N=CH), 7.213–8.378 (m, 8H, ArH), 10.23 (s, 1H, NH of imidazole); 13C NMR (DMSO): 115,123, 127, 135, 138, 150, 159, 162; MS: m/z = 267.28 (M+ +1).

(E)-N-Ethylidene-1H-benzo[d]imidazol-2-amine (8)

IR (KBr cm−1): 3267 (N–H str., of imidazole ring), 2924 (C–H aromatic ring str.), 1465 (Ar., C=C str.), 1550 (N=CH str.), 2877 (R-CH3, sym str.); 1H NMR (DMSO): 8.654 (s, 1H, N=CH), 6.897–7.143 (m, 4H, ArH), 1.243 (s, 3H, CH3); 13C NMR: 22, 111, 120, 154, 175. MS: m/z = 160.28 (M+ +1).

(E)-N-(4-Methoxybenzylidene)-1H-benzo[d]imidazol-2-amine (9)

IR (KBr cm−1): 3340 (N–H str., of imidazole ring), 2970 (C–H aromatic ring str.), 1496 (Ar., C=C str.), 1566 (N=CH str.), 1257 (C–O–C str.); 1H NMR (DMSO): 9.383 (s, 1H, N=CH), 7.027–7.960 (m, 8H, ArH), 3.523 (s, 3H, OCH3), 12.497 (s, 1H, NH of imidazole); 13C NMR (DMSO): 57, 114, 115, 123, 126, 130, 138, 162; MS: m/z = 252.28 (M+ +1).

(E)-5-((1H-Benzo[d]imidazol-2-yl)imino)pentanal (10)

IR (KBr cm−1): 3426 (N–H str.), 3054 (Ar., C-H str.), 1562 (C=C str.), 1623 (N=CH str.), 2773 (Aliphatic C–H str.), 1724 (Aliphatic aldehyde C=O str.); 1H NMR (DMSO): 8.454 (t, 1H, N=CH), 6.856–7.143 (m, 4H, ArH), 1.243–2.567 (m, 6H, CH2), 9.700 (t, 1H, CH = O); 13C NMR (DMSO): 18, 28, 44, 115, 123, 138, 160, 162, 202. MS: m/z = 216.26 (M+ +1).

(E)-N-(3,4,5-Trimethoxybenzylidene)-1H-benzo[d]imidazol-2-amine (11)

IR: 3429 (N–H str.), 3064 (Ar., C–H str.), 1577 (C=C str.), 1606 (N=CH str.), 2835 (Ar., O–CH3 str.); 1H NMR (DMSO): 9.476 (s, 1H, N=CH), 6.962–7.859 (m, 6H, ArH), 10.462 (s, 1H, NH of imidazole) 3.382 (s, 9H, (OCH3)3); 13C NMR (DMSO): 56, 106, 115, 123, 127, 138, 141, 152, 159, 162; MS: m/z = 312.14 (M+ +1).

(E)-1-(2-(Ethylideneamino)-1H-benzo[d]imidazol-1-yl)ethanone (12)

IR (KBr cm−1): 1661 (C=O str.), 2919 (C–H aromatic str.), 1575 (N=CH str.), 2849 (CH str. (sym), R-CH3); 1H NMR (DMSO): 7.305–7.627 (m, 4H, Ar–H), 7.233 (s, 1H, N=CH), 1.273–1.276 (d, 3H, CH3), 2.856 (s, 3H, CH3); 13C NMR (DMSO): 16, 24, 115, 123, 129, 138, 141, 162, 168; MS: m/z = 201 (M+ +1).

(E)-(3,5-Dinitrophenyl)(2-((4-methoxy-benzylidene)amino)-1H-benzo[d]imidazol-1-yl)methanone (13)

IR (KBr cm−1): 1710 (C=O str.), 2924 (C–H aromatic str.), 1537 (N=CH str.), 1545 (Ar-NO2 str.), 1110 (C–O–C str., OCH3); 1H NMR (DMSO): 6.785–7.943 (m, 8H, ArH), 8.632 (s, 1H, N=CH), 2.984 (s, 3H, (OCH3), 8.912–9.063 (m, 3H, Ar(NO2)2); 13C NMR (DMSO): 56, 115, 123, 125, 130, 150, 163, 168; MS: m/z = 445 (M+ +1).

(E)-5-((1-(3,5-Dinitrobenzoyl)-1H-benzo[d]imidazol-2-yl)imino)pentanal (14)

IR (KBr cm−1): 1701 (C=O str.), 3122 (C–H aromatic str.), 1627 (N=CH str.), 1543 (Ar., NO2 str.), 1727 (Aliphatic aldehyde C=O str.); 1H NMR (DMSO): 6.875-7.946 (m, 4H, ArH), 8.632 (s, 1H, N=CH), 8.912–9.063 (m, 3H, Ar(NO2)2), 9.254–9.678 (m, 1H, CHO); 13C NMR (DMSO): 19, 28, 44, 115, 123, 125, 130, 150, 163, 168; MS: m/z = 409 (M+ +1).

(E)-5-((1-Acetyl-1H-benzo[d]imidazol-2-yl)imino)pentanal (15)

IR (KBr cm−1): 1695 (C=O str.), 3050 (C–H aromatic str.), 1606 (N=CH str.), 1535 (C-NO2 str.), 2860 (C–H sym. str., R-CH3), 1728 (Aliphatic aldehyde C=O str.); 1H NMR (DMSO): 7.875–8.246 (m, 4H, ArH), 7.632 (s, 1H, N=CH), 9.254–9.678 (m, 1H, CHO), 2.856 (s, 3H, CH3); 13C NMR (DMSO): 19, 24, 28, 44, 115, 123, 138, 142, 163, 168, 202; MS: m/z = 257 (M+ +1).

(E)-(3,5-Dinitrophenyl)(2-((4-hydroxybenzylidene)amino)-1H-benzo[d]imidazol-1-yl)methanone (16)

IR (KBr cm−1): 1685 (C=O str.), 3094 (C–H aromatic str.), 1630 (N=CH str.), 1544 (C–NO2 str.), 3465 (O–H str); 1H NMR (DMSO): 6.885–7.632 (m, 8H, ArH), 8.654 (s, 1H, N=CH), 8.912–9.063 (m, 3H, Ar (NO2)2); 13C NMR (DMSO): 115, 123, 125, 130, 132, 138, 150, 160, 168; MS: m/z = 431 (M+ +1).

(E)-(2-((2,4-Dimethoxybenzylidene)amino)-1H-benzo[d]imidazol-1-yl)(naphthalen-2-yl)methanone (17)

IR (KBr cm−1): 1695 (C=O str.), 2919 (C–H aromatic str.), 1634 (N=CH str.), 2850 (Ar., OCH3 str.); 1646 (naph. ring str.); 1H NMR (DMSO): 6.844–8.213 (m, 14H, ArH), 8.612 (s, 1H, N=CH), 2.804 (s, 6H, (OCH3)2); 13C NMR (DMSO): 56, 101, 107, 109, 115, 123, 127, 129, 132, 138, 142, 160, 168; MS: m/z = 435 (M+ +1).

(E)-Naphthalen-2-yl(2-((3,4,5-trimethoxybenzylidene)amino)-1H-benzo[d]imidazol-1-yl)methanone (18)

IR (KBr cm−1): 1691 (C=O str.), 1548 (N=CH str.), 1140 (C–O–C str., OCH3); 795 (C–H out of plane bending, naphthalene ring); 1H NMR (DMSO): 8.590 (s, 1H, N=CH), 4.194 (s, 9H, (OCH3)3), 6.971–8.070 (m,11H, Ar–H); 13C NMR (DMSO): 57, 107, 115, 123, 124, 127, 128, 131, 139, 142, 151, 160, 168; MS: m/z = 465 (M+ +1).

(E)-(3,5-Dinitrophenyl)(2-((3,4,5-trimethoxybenzylidene)amino)-1H-benzo[d]imidazol-1-yl)methanone (19)

IR (KBr cm−1): 1681(C=O str.), 1539 (N=CH str.), 2850 (CH3 sym. str., R-OCH3); 1345 (C–NO2 str.); 1H NMR (DMSO): 8.947 (s, 1H, N=CH), 3.955 (s, 9H, (OCH3)3), 9.860–9.865 (m, 3H, Ar-(NO)2), 7.948–7.951 (d, 2H, Ar–H), 7.343–7.366 (m, 2H, Ar–H); 13C NMR (DMSO): 57, 106, 115, 125, 128, 129, 131, 139, 142, 147, 151, 168; MS: m/z = 505 (M+ +1).

(E)-1-(2-((3,4,5-trimethoxybenzylidene)amino)-1H-benzo[d]imidazol-1-yl)hexadecan-1-one (20)

IR (KBr cm−1): 1685 (C=O str.), 3061 (C–H aromatic str.), 1623 (N=CH str.), 2843 (Ar., O–CH3 str.), 1266 (Palmitoyl group str.); 1H NMR (DMSO): 7.283–7.286 (m, 6H, ArH), 1.278–2.386 (m, 28H, CH2 of palmitoyl), 0.884–0.903 (t, 3H, CH3), 3.264 (s, 9H, (OCH3)3); 13C NMR (DMSO): 14, 23, 26, 30, 32, 56, 106, 115, 123, 128, 130, 139, 142, 160, 170; MS: m/z = 549 (M+ +1).

(E)-(3-Nitrophenyl)(2-((4-(pyridin-2-yl)benzylidene)amino)-1H-benzo[d]imidazol-1-yl) methanone (21)

IR (KBr cm−1): 1682 (C=O str.), 2922 (C–H aromatic str.), 1525 (N=CH str.), 1557 (C=C and C=N str. of pyridine ring), 1543 (C–NO2 str.); 1H NMR (DMSO): 10.019 (s, 1H, N=CH), 7.305–8.658 (m, 15H, ArH), 8.662 (s, 1H, Ar–NO2); 13C NMR (DMSO): 115, 123, 126, 129, 130, 132, 142, 150, 155, 160, 168; MS: m/z = 447 (M+ +1).

(2-((E)-((E)-3-(4-(Dimethylamino)phenyl)allylidene)amino)-1H-benzo[d]imidazol-1-yl)(3-nitrophenyl)methanone (22)

IR (KBr cm−1): 1723(C=O str.), 2920 (C–H aromatic str.), 1530 (N=CH str.), 1549 (Ar-NO2 str.), 1349 (C–N str., of ter. arylamine); 1H NMR (DMSO): 8.390–8.410 (d, 1H, N=CH), 6.731–6.740 (d, 1H, –CH = CH), 6.250–8.355 (m, 11H, ArH), 8.919 (s, 1H, Ar-NO2) 3.559 (s, 6H, (CH3)2); 13C NMR (DMSO): 40, 115, 123, 127, 131, 138, 149, 164, 168; MS: m/z = 439 (M+ +1).

(E)-(2-((4-(Dimethylamino)benzylidene)amino)-1H-benzo[d]imidazol-1-yl)(3-nitrophenyl) methanone (23)

IR (KBr cm−1): 1719 (C=O str.), 3085 (C–H aromatic str.), 1615 (N=CH str.), 1545 (Ar-NO2 str.), 1514 (C–N str.); 1H NMR (DMSO): 7.169–8.987 (m, 12H, ArH), 9.568 (s, 1H, N=CH), 2.909 (s, 6H (CH3)2); 13C NMR (DMSO): 40, 115, 123, 127, 131, 138, 149, 160, 168; MS: m/z = 413 (M+ +1).

(E)-(2-(((2-hydroxynaphthalen-1-yl)-methylene)amino)-1H-benzo[d]imidazol-1-yl)(3-nitrophenyl)methanone (24)

IR (KBr cm−1): 1696 (C=O str.), 2924 (C–H aromatic str.), 1553 (N=CH str.), 1546 (Ar-NO2 str.), 752 (O–H bending (out of plane)); 1H NMR (DMSO): 6.748–8.632 (m, 14H, ArH), 9.652 (s, 1H, N=CH); 13C NMR (DMSO):115, 118, 123, 125, 127, 128, 131, 138, 149, 160, 168; MS: m/z = 436 (M+ +1).

(E)-(2-((4-Nitrobenzylidene)amino)-1H-benzo[d]imidazol-1-yl)(3-nitrophenyl)methanone (25)

IR (KBr cm−1): 1704 (C=O str.), 3107 (C–H aromatic str.), 1617 (N=CH str.), 1549 (Ar., NO2 str.); 1H NMR (DMSO): 7.206–8.689 (m, 12H, ArH), 9.672 (s, 1H, N=CH); 13C NMR (DMSO): 115, 121, 123, 125, 127, 131, 136, 139, 151, 160, 168; MS: m/z = 415 (M+ +1).

(E)-Naphthalen-2-yl(2-((4-nitrobenzylidene)amino)-1H-benzo[d]imidazol-1-yl)methanone (26)

IR (KBr cm−1): 1686 (C=O str.), 3056 (C–H aromatic str.), 1600 (N=CH str.), 1545 (Ar., NO2 str.), 1592 (Naphthalene ring str.); 1H NMR (DMSO): 6.865–7.954 (m, 11H, ArH), 8.765 (s, 1H, N=CH), 8.923–8.967 (m, 4H, Ar(NO2); 13C NMR (DMSO): 115, 123, 124, 128, 129, 131, 135, 136, 139, 142, 149, 160, 168; MS: m/z = 420 (M+ +1).

(E)-(2-((3,4-Dimethoxybenzylidene)amino)-1H-benzo[d]imidazol-1-yl)(3-nitro phenyl)methanone (27)

IR (KBr cm−1): 1684 (C=O str.), 1611 (N=CH str.), 2875 (Ar., O–CH3 str.); 1543 (Ar., NO2 str.); 1H NMR (DMSO): 7.463–8.932 (m, 11H, ArH), 8.185 (s, 1H, N=CH), 2.904 (s, 6H, (OCH3)2); 13C NMR (DMSO): 56, 115, 123, 125, 127, 136, 139, 142, 147, 150, 152, 160, 168; MS: m/z = 430 (M+ +1).

(E)-1-(2-((4-Nitrobenzylidene)amino)-1H-benzo[d]imidazol-1-yl)hexadecan-1-one (28)

IR (KBr cm−1): 1685 (C=O str.), 2954 (C–H aromatic str.), 1618 (N=CH str.), 1271 (Palmitoyl group. str.), 1547 (Ar-NO2str.); 1H NMR (DMSO): 7.624–8.163 (m, 8H, ArH), 8.672 (s, 1H, N=CH), 1.243–2.496 (m, 28H, CH2 of palmitoyl), 0.845–0.878 (t, 3H, CH3); 13C NMR (DMSO): 14, 23, 26, 30, 32, 56, 106, 115, 120, 123, 125, 128, 131, 135, 136, 139, 142, 149, 160, 170; MS: m/z = 504 (M+ +1).

(E)-1-(2-((4-(Dimethylamino)benzylidene)amino)-1H-benzo[d]imidazol-1-yl)hexadecan-1-one (29)

IR (KBr cm−1): 2927 (C–H, aromatic str.), 2813 (C–H str. aliphatic), 1659 (C=O str.), 1594 (N=CH str.), 1303 (C–N str.), 1278 (palmitoyl group str.); 1H NMR (DMSO): 7.878–7.901 (d, 1H, N=CH), 6.606–6.622 (d, 1H, –CH = CH), 6.661–7.519 (m, 8H, ArH), 3.773 (s, 6H, (CH3)2), 1.252–2.368 (m, 28H, CH2 of palmitoyl), 0.861–0.894 (t, 3H, CH3); 13C NMR (DMSO): 14, 23, 26, 30, 32, 56, 106, 115, 120, 123, 125, 128, 130, 139, 142, 149, 164, 170; MS: m/z = 528 (M+ +1).

(E)-(2-((4-(Dimethylamino)benzylidene)amino)-1H-benzo[d]imidazol-1-yl)(naphthalen-2-yl)methanone (30)

IR (KBr cm−1): 1683 (C=O str.), 3054 (C–H aromatic str.), 1608 (N=CH str.), 1521 (Ar. NO2 str.), 1448 (C–N str.), 778 (C–H out of plane bending, naphthalene ring); 1H NMR (DMSO): 6.668–7.985 (m, 15H, ArH), 9.584 (s, 1H, N=CH), 2.909 (s, 6H (CH3)2); 13C NMR (DMSO): 40, 115, 123, 124, 128, 130, 139, 142, 160, 168; MS: m/z = 418 (M+ +1).

Biological evaluation

In vitro antimicrobial assay

Tube dilution method [15] was used to determine the antimicrobial activity of synthesized compounds against Gram-positive bacteria: Staphylococcus aureus (MTCC-3160); Bacillus subtilis (MTCC-441), the Gram-negative bacterium Escherichia coli (MTCC-443) and fungal species: Candida albicans (MTCC-227) and Aspergillus niger (MTCC-281). Dilutions were made for test and standard compounds in appropriate double strength nutrient broth—I.P. (bacteria) or Sabouraud dextrose broth—I.P. (fungi) [16]. The test and standard compounds were incubated at 37 °C for 24 h (bacteria), at 25 °C for 7 days (A. niger) and at 37 °C for 48 h (C. albicans) and the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) was recorded in µg/mL.

In vitro anticancer assay

The in vitro anticancer activity of the developed compounds was performed by the Sulforhodamine B (SRB) assay as described by Skehan et al. [14]. The optimal MCF-7 cell count was seeded on flat-bottom well plates and allowed to attach overnight. The compounds (20 μL) were added in quadruplicates and incubated for 72 h (both drug-free control and treated cells). Cells in each well were fixed with 200 μL of 10% cold trichloroacetic acid. After incubation for 30 min, the individual wells were rinsed with water, allowed to stain in 100 µL 0.4% SRB [Sigma-Aldrich, St Louis, Missouri, USA] (w/v; in 1% acetic acid) for 15 min. The air-dried plates were placed on a plate shaker and bound SRB was solubilised in 100 µL 10 mM Tris base solution. Absorbance was measured using a spectrophotometer at 570 nm and a dose–response curve was plotted from which the IC50 value of each compound against each cell type was determined.

Conclusion

In conclusion, a series of 1,2-disubstituted benzimidazole derivatives were synthesized and assessed for in vitro antimicrobial and anticancer activities against five representative microbial species and cancer cell line. Antimicrobial activity results indicated that the synthesized compound 1 has promising activity towards Gram negative bacteria E. coli. None of the compound showed more potent activity against Gram positive bacteria B. subtilis and S. aureus when compared to reference drug norfloxacin. Moreover, compounds 2 and 19 showed interesting results against fungal strains C. albicans and A. niger and comparable to fluconazole. The results from anticancer activity indicated that compounds 12, 21, 22 and 29 showed promising activity against MCF7. These active compounds may be taken as lead compounds for discovery of novel antimicrobial and anticancer agents in future.

References

  1. Grossman TH, Bartels DJ, Mullin S, Gross CH, Parsons JD, Liao Y, Grillot AL, Stamos D, Olson ER, Charifson PS, Mani N (2007) Dual targeting of GyrBand ParE by a novel aminobenzimidazole class of antibacterial compounds. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 51:657–666

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Hassan GS, Kadry HH, Abou-Seri SM, Ali MM, Mahmoud AEE (2011) Synthesis and in vitro cytotoxic activity of novel pyrazolo[3,4-d]pyrim.idines and related pyrazole hydrazones toward breast adenocarcinoma MCF-7 cell line. Bioorg Med Chem 19:6808–6817

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Ozkay Y, Tunali Y, Karaca H, Isikdag I (2010) Antimicrobial activity and a SAR study of some novel benzimidazole derivatives bearing hydrazone moiety. Eur J Med Chem 45:3293–3298

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Arora RK, Kaur N, Bansaln Y, Bansal G (2014) Novel coumarin–benzimidazole derivatives as antioxidants and safer anti-inflammatory agents. Acta Pharm Sin B 4:368–375

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Alasmary FA, Snelling AM, Alafeefy ME, Awaad S, Karodia N (2015) Synthesis and evaluation of selected benzimidazole derivatives as potential antimicrobial agents. Antimicrob Agents Mol 20:15206–15223

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Oh S, Kim S, Kong S, Yang G, Lee N, Han D, Goo J, Siqueira-Neto JL, Freitas-Junior LH, Song R (2014) Synthesis and biological evaluation of 2,3-dihydroimidazo[1,2- a]benzimidazole derivatives against Leishmaniadonovani and Trypanosomacruzi. Eur J Med Chem 84:395–403

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. El-Gohary NS, Shaaban MI (2017) Synthesis and biological evaluation of a new series of benzimidazole derivatives as antimicrobial, antiquorum-sensing and antitumor agents. Eur J Med Chem 131:255–262

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Luo Y, Yao JP, Yang L, Feng CL, Tang W, Wang GF, Zuo JP, Lu W (2011) Synthesis and anti-Hepatitis B virus activity of a novel class of thiazolylbenzimidazole derivatives. Arch Pharm Chem Life Sci 2:78–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Lee-Dutra A, Arienti KL, Buzard DJ, Hack MD, Khatuya H, Desai PJ, Nguyen S, Thurmond RL, Karlsson L, Edwards JP, Breitenbucher JG (2006) Identification of 2-arylbenzimidazoles as potent human histamine H4 receptor ligands. Bioorg Med Chem Lett 16:6043–6048

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Sogame S, Suenaga Y, Atobe M, Kawanishi M, Tanaka E, Miyoshi S (2014) Discovery of a benzimidazole series of ADAMTS-5 (aggrecanase-2) inhibitors by scaffold hopping. Eur J Med Chem 71:250–258

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Shingalapur RV, Hosamani KM, Keri RS (2009) Synthesis and evaluation of in vitro anti-microbial and anti-tubercular activity of 2-styryl benzimidazoles. Eur J Med Chem 44:4244–4248

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Cinarli A, Gurbuz D, Tavman A, Birteksoz AS (2011) Synthesis, spectral characterizations and antimicrobial activity of some Schiff bases of 4-chloro-2-aminophenol. Bull Chem Soc Ethiop 25:407–417

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Kumar P, Narasimhan B, Yogeswari P, Sriram D (2010) Synthesis and antitubercular activities of substituted benzoic acid N’-(substituted benzylidene/furan-2-ylmethylene)-N-(pyridine-3-carbonyl)-hydrazides. Eur J Med Chem 45:6085–6089

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Skehan P, Storeng R, Scudiero D, Monks A, McMahon J, Vistica D, Warren JT, Bokesch H, Kenney S, Boyd MR (1990) New colorimetric cytotoxicity assay for anticancer-drug screening. J Natl Cancer Inst 82:1107–1112

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Cappucino JG, Sherman N (1999) Microbiology—a laboratory manual. Addison Wesley California 263

  16. Pharmacopoeia of India, vol.-Ӏ (2007) Controller of publication, ministry of health department, Govt. of India, New Delhi, 37

Download references

Authors’ contributions

SSS, BN, NV and SK have designed, synthesized and carried out the antimicrobial activity and SML, SAAS, KR and VM have carried out the spectral analysis, interpretation and cytotoxicity study of synthesized compounds. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgements

The authors are thankful to the Dean, University School of Chemical Technology, IP University, New Delhi and Head, Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, M.D. University, Rohtak, for providing necessary facilities to carry out this research work.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Funding

Not applicable.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. SGT College of Pharmacy, Shree Guru Gobind Singh Tricentenary (SGT) University, Gurugram, 122505, India

    Neelam Vashist

  2. University School of Chemical Technology, Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha University, Sector-16C, Dwarka, New Delhi, 110078, India

    Surinder Singh Sambi

  3. Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Maharshi Dayanand University, Rohtak, 124001, India

    Balasubramanian Narasimhan & Sanjiv Kumar

  4. Faculty of Pharmacy, Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM), 42300, Bandar Puncak Alam, Selangor Darul Ehsan, Malaysia

    Siong Meng Lim, Syed Adnan Ali Shah & Kalavathy Ramasamy

  5. Collaborative Drug Discovery Research (CDDR) Group, Pharmaceutical Life Sciences Community of Research, Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM), 40450, Shah Alam, Selangor Darul Ehsan, Malaysia

    Siong Meng Lim & Kalavathy Ramasamy

  6. Atta-ur-Rahman Institute for Natural Products Discovery (AuRIns), Universiti Teknologi MARA, Puncak Alam Campus, 42300, Bandar Puncak Alam, Selangor Darul Ehsan, Malaysia

    Syed Adnan Ali Shah

  7. Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, College of Pharmacy, Qassim University, Buraidah, 51452, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia

    Vasudevan Mani

Authors
  1. Neelam Vashist
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Surinder Singh Sambi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Balasubramanian Narasimhan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Sanjiv Kumar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Siong Meng Lim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Syed Adnan Ali Shah
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Kalavathy Ramasamy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Vasudevan Mani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Balasubramanian Narasimhan.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Vashist, N., Sambi, S.S., Narasimhan, B. et al. Synthesis and biological profile of substituted benzimidazoles. Chemistry Central Journal 12, 125 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13065-018-0498-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13065-018-0498-y

Keywords

BMC Chemistry

ISSN: 2661-801X

Contact us