- Open Access
Decaprenyl-phosphoryl-ribose 2′-epimerase (DprE1): challenging target for antitubercular drug discovery
© The Author(s) 2018
- Received: 12 March 2018
- Accepted: 19 June 2018
- Published: 23 June 2018
Tuberculosis has proved harmful to the entire history of mankind from past several decades. Decaprenyl-phosphoryl-ribose 2′-epimerase (DprE1) is a recent target which was identified in 2009 but unfortunately it is neither explored nor crossed phase II. In past several decades few targets were identified for effective antitubercular drug discovery. Resistance is the major problem for effective antitubercular drug discovery. Arabinose is constituent of mycobacterium cell wall. Biosynthesis of arabinose is FAD dependant two step epimerisation reaction which is catalysed by DprE1 and DprE2 flavoprotein enzymes. The current review is mainly emphases on DprE1 as a perspective challenge for further research.
- Antitubercular agents
- Covalent and non covalent inhibitors
- Future needs
Tuberculosis (TB) is a major worldwide concern whose control has become more critical due to HIV and increased multidrug-resistance (MDR-TB) and extensively drug resistance (XDR-TB) strains of Mycobacterium tuberculosis . The need for newer and effective antiTB drugs are more essential. In the previous decade hard efforts have been made to find new leads for TB drug development utilizing both target-based and structure-based methodologies . Here, we have emphasized on few covalent and non-covalent Decaprenyl-phosphoryl-ribose 2′-epimerase (DprE1) inhibitors which might play the important role in most useful antitubercular therapies those are in clinical advancement. DprE1, an enzyme protein associated with a vital step of epimerisation in mycobacterial cell wall biosynthesis .
Mycobacterium tuberculosis is one of the world’s most dreadful human pathogen because of its ability to persist inside humans for longer time period in a clinically inactive state. Roughly 95% of the general population who infected (33% of the worldwide population) built up an inert infection. The current available vaccine, Mycobacterium bovis Bacillus Calmette–Guerin (BCG), is mostly used in recent years. Specifically, this vaccine prevent most serious types of the infection and not from disease. M. tuberculosis stimulates a solid response, however it has advanced to oppose the body’s activities to kill it and regardless of the possibility of underlying disease is effectively controlled, many people built up an inactive infection that can hold on for quite a long time . For example, Aagaard and colleagues  have built up a multistage immunization technique in which the early antigens Ag85B and 6-kDa early secretory antigenic target are joined with the inertness related protein Rv2660c (H56 antibody). In two mouse models of dormant tuberculosis, they demonstrated that, H56 immunization after presentation can control reactivation and altogether bring down the bacterial load contrasted with adjuvant control mice. The discovery of drugs with novel mechanism of action is direly required because of the expanding number of multidrug safe (MDR), which are strains of M. tuberculosis that are resistant to both isoniazid and rifampicin, with or without protection from different medications, broadly XDR and MDR strains additionally resistant to any fluoroquinolone and any of the second-line against TB injectable medications (amikacin, kanamycin, or capreomycin) .
Mycobacteria are resistant to regular antibiotics with the few exceptions of aminoglycosides, rifamycins and fluoroquinolones . General resistance from therapeutic agents is identified with the structure of the mycobacterial cell envelope bringing about low permeability to exogenous factors . Therefore, a few chemotherapeutic operators are active against Mtb were created. After streptomycin—the primary antitubercular agent and 4-aminosalicylic acid in the 1940s, isoniazid was presented in 1952 and still is the significant component of the antibiotic treatment of TB, WHO groups first-line and second-line antitubercular operators relying on their adequacy and resistance .
The heteromeric protein decaprenyl-phospho-ribose 2′-epimerase catalyzes the epimerization reaction of decaprenylphosphoryl-d-ribose (DPR) into decaprenylphosphoryl-d-arabinose (DPA) . This reaction occurs through a successive oxidation–reduction involving the intermediate (decaprenylphosphoryl-2-keto-β-d-erythro-pentofuranose, DPX), which is a result of DPR oxidation and a precursor of DPA . This compound is made up of two proteins encoded by the DprE1 and DprE2 genes. DprE1 and DprE2 have been recommended as decaprenylphosphoryl-β-d-ribose oxidase and decaprenylphosphoryl-d-2-keto erythro pentose reductase, separation . Trefzer and collaborators announced the in vitro interpretation of the enzymatic exercises of sanitized recombinant DprE1 and DprE2 orthologous proteins from Mycobacterium smegmatis and exhibited that DprE1 goes about as an oxidase and DprE2 as a reductase . For epimerase activity, a synchronous articulation of the two polypeptides is required .
Three structures of Mycobacterium smegmatis DprE1 have been established in two distinctive groups and one structure contains BTZ043 . The 19 different structures are M. tuberculosis DprE1 solidified, to be specific hexagonal and orthorhombic, in complex with or without inhibitors . DprE1 is represented by the two-domain topology of the vanillyl-liquor oxidase group of oxido-reductases including a FAD-restricting area and the substrate-restricting ares . The monoclinic and hexagonal precious stone structures show an obvious dimer of DprE1. In any case , DprE1 does not dimerise in solution. The cofactor is profoundly covered in the FAD-restricting area, with the isoalloxazine present at the interface of the substrate-restricting space before the substrate-restricting pocket . As contrast to the homologous structure of alditol oxidase, DprE1 does not covalently tie the prosthetic assembly. Intriguingly, the M. smegmatis DprE1 structure has likewise been understood without the FAD cofactor, showing that FAD is inessential for the collapsing of the protein. Electron density in all crystal structures acquired for M. tuberculosis or M. smegmatis .
BTZ043, the lead compound of the benzothiazinone (BTZ) series, was the primary DprE1 inhibitor described and is particularly strong with an in vitro or in vivo minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) in the nanomolar extend . The mechanism of BTZ043 clarifies its significant strength since it carries on as a suicide substrate for the decreased type of DprE1 . BTZ043 and other BTZ series experience nitroreduction to nitroso derivatives, which particularly frames a covalent adduct with cysteine 387 (C387) in the dynamic site of DprE1, irreversibly hindering the protein . C387 is profoundly saved in orthologous DprE1 chemicals in actinobacteria, aside from in Mycobacterium avium and Mycobacterium aurum where cysteine is supplanted by alanine and serine individually. These transformations present characteristic BTZ protection .
Covalent and non-covalent DprE1inhibitors
Non covalent inhibitors
1,2,4-Triazole containing 1,4-BTZ derivatives
Mycobacterium smegmatis DprE1 was crystallised in complex with BTZ043, revealing insight into the basic principle of the inhibition mechanisms of covalent inhibitors . BTZ043 is a component based covalent inhibitor, which requires the enzymatic action of the protein with the substrate to change over the nitro group of BTZ043 to get the structure of the covalent complex, DprE1 was incubated with BTZ043 and farnesylphosphoryl-d-ribofuranose (FPR; a simple of DPR with a shorter polyprenyl chain filling in as a reasonable chemical substrate) before performing crystallisation trials . BTZ043 is situated in the substrate-restricting pocket before the isoalloxazine ring of FAD and ties covalently to C394 (proportional to C387 in M. tuberculosis). There are no major basic changes between the local complex types of DprE1 . The trifluoromethyl group of BTZ043 is arranged in a hydrophobic pocket framed by side chains of H132, G133, K134, K367, F369 and N385. The piperidine ring of BTZ043 is kept up on each side by the isoalloxazine ring of FAD, and by G117 and V365. The spirocyclic moiety of BTZ043 is situated at the protein surface and needs full electron thickness, bringing about the adaptability of this area of the particle. To be sure, there is just a single van der Waals interaction amongst L363 and the spirocyclic moiety .
In the greater part of the drug resistance mutants inspected, a similar codon of dprE1 was influenced: the cysteine at position 387 was supplanted by serine or glycine codons, separately. The BTZ protection deciding district of dprE1 was profoundly saved in orthologous qualities from different Actinobacteria, aside from that in a couple of situations where Cys387 was replaced by serine or alanine. The comparing microscopic organisms, Mycobacterium avium and Mycobacterium aurum, were observed to be normally resistant to BTZ, in this way supporting the distinguishing proof of DprE1 as the BTZ target . As early metabolic investigations with microscopic organisms or mice demonstrated that the BTZ nitro group could be lessened to an amino group, the S and R enantiomers of the amino groups and the imaginable hydroxylamine middle were incorporated and tried for antimycobacterial action. The amino and hydroxylamine groups were significantly less dynamic regard to the nitro group. Regarding this, a protection mechanism to BTZs was represented in M. smegmatis . The overexpression of the nitroreductase NfnB prompts the inactivation of the medication by lessening of a basic nitro group to an amino group. Some M. smegmatis BTZ-safe mutants which harbored neither changes in MSMEG_6382 (dprE1) nor in MSMEG_6385 (dprE2), however in the MSMEG_6503 quality, coding for a putative transcriptional controller from the TetR family were separated. It unveiled that this controller controls the translation of the MSMEG_6505 quality, coding for NfnB compound. This transformation prompted a flawed repressor, causing overexpression of NfnB and thus, the decrease of the BTZ nitro atom to its less dynamic amino group . To additionally the immediate part of NfnB in the BTZ protection, an in-outline unmarked cancellation was made in the nfnB quality and the ΔnfnB strain was touchy to BTZ .
Basic characterization of TCA1 in complex with M. tuberculosis DprE1 uncovered that TCA1 is situated in the focal cavity of DprE1 in a boomerang-like compliance as on account of the covalent inhibitors, with the thiophene moiety arranged somewhere down in the hydro-phobic pocket at the base of the dynamic site . Likewise with the covalent inhibitors, this cooperation has all the earmarks of being vital for the official. Besides, TCA1 is kept up by polar contacts between the carboxamido group and thiazole nitrogen of TCA1 and K418 of M. tuberculosis DprE1 . Additionally, the carbamate moiety forms van der Waals interaction critical for the stabilisation of the compound with the phenyl ring of Y314 .
Tuberculosis is one of the potential threat to entire mankind as per the history. The numbers of WHO supports global burden of this infection which is increasing drastically. Among the millions of unexplored targets for antitubercular drug discovery, DprE1 is recently came out. Specifically, Nitro group of synthesized compounds gets reduced to nitroso and then it forms adduct with Cys387 residue to exhibit DprE1 inhibitory activity. Very few amount of protein was isolated and studied for specific inhibitory activity. There are few derivatives which were reported in past decade with potential DprE1 inhibitory activity. Even though they have shown DprE1 inhibition but none of them has passed phase II trials. Those inhibitors were covalent as well as non-covalent too. The situation is alarming, so there is strict need to explore this target by designing novel potential analogues to combat drug resistance Mycobacterium tuberculosis at the earliest to serve the humanity. There is a strong possibility that DprE1 inhibitors might be active against DprE2 because of the crystal structure of enzyme. In future, researchers have wide scope to work on that with two approaches viz., by designing potent DprE1 inhibitors which may acts against DprE2, by comparing mutants in DprE2.
JG perceived the ideas for this manuscript and also wrote the manuscript. CB reviewed regularly, suggested corrections, majors for improvisation. Both authors read and approved the final manuscript.
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
- Cole ST, Riccardi G (2011) New tuberculosis drugs on the horizon. Curr Opin Microbiol 14(5):570–576View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Harrington M (2010) From HIV to tuberculosis and back again: a tale of activism in 2 pandemics. Clin Infect Dis 50(Supplement_3):S260–S266View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Medapi B, Renuka J, Saxena S et al (2015) Design and synthesis of novel quinoline–aminopiperidine hybrid analogues as Mycobacterium tuberculosis DNA gyraseB inhibitors. Bioorg Med Chem 23(9):2062–2078View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Aagaard C, Hoang T, Dietrich J et al (2011) A multistage tuberculosis vaccine that confers efficient protection before and after exposure. Nat Med 17(2):189–194View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Chao MC, Rubin EJ (2010) Letting sleeping dos lie: does dormancy play a role in tuberculosis? Annu Rev Microbiol 64:293–311View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ma Z, Lienhardt C, McIlleron H et al (2010) Global tuberculosis drug development pipeline: the need and the reality. Lancet 375(9731):2100–2109View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Koul A, Arnoult E, Lounis N et al (2011) The challenge of new drug discovery for tuberculosis. Nature 469(7331):483–490View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ginsberg AM (2010) Drugs in development for tuberculosis. Drugs 70(17):2201–2214View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lindenberger JJ, Veleti SK, Wilson BN et al (2015) Crystal structures of Mycobacterium tuberculosis GlgE and complexes with non-covalent inhibitors. Sci Rep 5:12830View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Manina G, Pasca MR, Buroni S et al (2010) Decaprenylphosphoryl-β-d-ribose 2′-epimerase from Mycobacterium tuberculosis is a magic drug target. Curr Med Chem 17(27):3099–3108View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Parchina A, Froeyen M, Margamuljana L et al (2013) Discovery of an acyclic nucleoside phosphonate that inhibits Mycobacterium tuberculosis ThyX based on the binding mode of a 5-alkynyl substrate analogue. ChemMedChem 8(8):1373–1383View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Trefzer C, Škovierová H, Buroni S et al (2011) Benzothiazinones are suicide inhibitors of mycobacterial decaprenylphosphoryl-β-d-ribofuranose 2′-oxidase DprE1. J Am Chem Soc 134(2):912–915View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Meniche X, De Sousa-D’Auria C, Van-der-Rest B et al (2008) Partial redundancy in the synthesis of the d-arabinose incorporated in the cell wall arabinan of Corynebacterineae. Microbiology 154(8):2315–2326View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Batt SM, Jabeen T, Bhowruth V et al (2012) Structural basis of inhibition of Mycobacterium tuberculosis DprE1 by benzothiazinone inhibitors. Proc Natl Acad Sci 109(28):11354–11359View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Luciani R, Saxena P, Surade S et al (2016) Virtual screening and X-ray crystallography identify non-substrate analog inhibitors of flavin-dependent thymidylate synthase. J Med Chem 59(19):9269–9275View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Landge S, Mullick AB, Nagalapur K et al (2015) Discovery of benzothiazoles as antimycobacterial agents: synthesis, structure–activity relationships and binding studies with Mycobacterium tuberculosis decaprenylphosphoryl-β-d-ribose 2′-oxidase. Bioorg Med Chem 23(24):7694–7710View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Makarov V, Lechartier B, Zhang M et al (2014) Towards a new combination therapy for tuberculosis with next generation benzothiazinones. EMBO Mol Med. https://doi.org/10.1002/emmm.201303575 Google Scholar
- Piton J, Foo CSY, Cole ST (2017) Structural studies of Mycobacterium tuberculosis DprE1 interacting with its inhibitors. Drug Discov Today 22(3):526–533View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Jeankumar VU, Renuka J, Pulla VK et al (2014) Development of novel N-linked aminopiperidine-based mycobacterial DNA gyrase B inhibitors: scaffold hopping from known antibacterial leads. Int J Antimicrob Agents 43(3):269–278View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Riccardi G, Pasca MR, Chiarelli LR et al (2013) The DprE1 enzyme, one of the most vulnerable targets of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 97(20):8841–8848View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Crellin PK, Brammananth R, Coppel RL (2011) Decaprenylphosphoryl-β-d-ribose 2′-epimerase, the target of benzothiazinones and dinitrobenzamides, is an essential enzyme in Mycobacterium smegmatis. PLoS ONE 6(2):e16869View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kolly GS, Boldrin F, Sala C et al (2014) Assessing the essentiality of the decaprenyl-phospho-d-arabinofuranose pathway in Mycobacterium tuberculosis using conditional mutants. Mol Microbiol 92(1):194–211View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Makarov V, Manina G, Mikusova K et al (2009) Benzothiazinones kill Mycobacterium tuberculosis by blocking arabinan synthesis. Science 324(5928):801–804View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Brecik M, Centárová I, Mukherjee R et al (2015) DprE1 is a vulnerable tuberculosis drug target due to its cell wall localization. ACS Chem Biol 10(7):1631–1636View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Narender M, Umasankar K, Malathi J et al (2016) Synthesis, in vitro antimycobacterial evaluation and docking studies of some new 5,6,7,8-tetrahydropyrido[4′,3′:4,5]thieno[2,3-d] pyrimidin-4(3H)-one schiff bases. Bioorg Med Chem Lett 26(3):836–840View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Stanley SA, Grant SS, Kawate T et al (2012) Identification of novel inhibitors of M. tuberculosis growth using whole cell based high-throughput screening. ACS Chem Biol 7(8):1377–1384View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wang F, Sambandan D, Halder R et al (2013) Identification of a small molecule with activity against drug-resistant and persistent tuberculosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci 110(27):E2510–E2517View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kieser KJ, Rubin EJ (2014) How sisters grow apart: mycobacterial growth and division. Nat Rev Microbiol 12(8):550–562View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Takayama K, Kilburn JO (1989) Inhibition of synthesis of arabinogalactan by ethambutol in Mycobacterium smegmatis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 33(9):1493–1499View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Chikhale R, Menghani S, Babu R et al (2015) Development of selective DprE1 inhibitors: design, synthesis, crystal structure and antitubercular activity of benzothiazolylpyrimidine-5-carboxamides. Eur J Med Chem 96:30–46View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Villemagne B, Crauste C, Flipo M et al (2012) Tuberculosis: the drug development pipeline at a glance. Eur J Med Chem 51:1–16View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Chatterji M, Shandil R, Manjunatha M et al (2014) 1,4-Azaindole, a potential drug candidate for treatment of tuberculosis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 58(9):5325–5331View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Panda M, Ramachandran S, Ramachandran V et al (2014) Discovery of pyrazolopyridones as a novel class of noncovalent DprE1 inhibitor with potent anti-mycobacterial activity. J Med Chem 57(11):4761–4771View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Shirude PS, Shandil R, Sadler C et al (2013) Azaindoles: noncovalent DprE1 inhibitors from scaffold morphing efforts, kill Mycobacterium tuberculosis and are efficacious in vivo. J Med Chem 56(23):9701–9708View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Christophe T, Jackson M, Jeon HK et al (2009) High content screening identifies decaprenyl-phosphoribose 2′ epimerase as a target for intracellular antimycobacterial inhibitors. PLoS Pathog 5(10):e1000645View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Naik M, Humnabadkar V, Tantry SJ et al (2014) 4-Aminoquinolone piperidine amides: noncovalent inhibitors of DprE1 with long residence time and potent antimycobacterial activity. J Med Chem 57(12):5419–5434View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Makarov V, Neres J, Hartkoorn RC et al (2015) The 8-pyrrole-benzothiazinones are noncovalent inhibitors of DprE1 from Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 59(8):4446–4452View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Neres J, Hartkoorn RC, Chiarelli LR et al (2014) 2-Carboxyquinoxalines kill Mycobacterium tuberculosis through noncovalent inhibition of DprE1. ACS Chem Biol 10(3):705–714View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Tiwari R, Miller PA, Chiarelli LR et al (2016) Design, syntheses, and anti-TB activity of 1,3-benzothiazinone azide and click chemistry products inspired by BTZ043. ACS Med Chem Lett 7(3):266–270View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Magnet S, Hartkoorn RC, Székely R et al (2010) Leads for antitubercular compounds from kinase inhibitor library screens. Tuberculosis 90(6):354–360View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Shaikh MH, Subhedar DD, Arkile M et al (2016) Synthesis and bioactivity of novel triazole incorporated benzothiazinone derivatives as antitubercular and antioxidant agent. Bioorg Med Chem Lett 26(2):561–569View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Manina G, Bellinzoni M, Pasca MR et al (2010) Biological and structural characterization of the Mycobacterium smegmatis nitroreductase NfnB, and its role in benzothiazinone resistance. Mol Microbiol 77(5):1172–1185View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ribeiro ALDJL, Degiacomi G, Ewann F et al (2011) Analogous mechanisms of resistance to benzothiazinones and dinitrobenzamides in Mycobacterium smegmatis. PloS ONE 6(11):e26675View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Pasca MR, Degiacomi G, Ribeiro ALdJL et al (2010) Clinical isolates of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in four European hospitals are uniformly susceptible to benzothiazinones. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 54(4):1616–1618View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Li W, Obregón-Henao A, Wallach JB et al (2016) Therapeutic potential of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis mycolic acid transporter, MmpL3. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 60(9):5198–5207View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Laughon BE, Nacy CA (2016) Tuberculosis—drugs in the development pipeline. Nat Revi Dis Primers. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrdp.2017 Google Scholar
- Sevilla IA, Molina E, Tello M et al (2017) Detection of mycobacteria by culture and DNA-based methods in animal-derived food products purchased at Spanish supermarkets. Front Microbiol 8:1030View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wu DJ, Adamopoulos IE (2017) Loss of WDFY3 ameliorates severity of serum transfer-induced arthritis independently of autophagy. Cell Immunol 316:61–69View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Stewart GR, Robertson BD, Young DB (2003) Tuberculosis: a problem with persistence. Nat Rev Microbiol 1(2):97–105View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Pethe K, Sequeira PC, Agarwalla S et al (2010) A chemical genetic screen in Mycobacterium tuberculosis identifies carbon-source-dependent growth inhibitors devoid of in vivo efficacy. Nat Commun 1(5):1View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Maddry JA, Ananthan S, Goldman RC et al (2009) Antituberculosis activity of the molecular libraries screening center network library. Tuberculosis 89(5):354–363View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Zumla A, Nahid P, Cole ST (2013) Advances in the development of new tuberculosis drugs and treatment regimens. Nat Rev Drug Discov 12(5):388–404View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lechartier B, Rybniker J, Zumla A et al (2014) Tuberculosis drug discovery in the post-post-genomic era. EMBO Mol Med. https://doi.org/10.1002/emmm.201201772 Google Scholar
- Kale RR, Kale MG, Waterson D et al (2014) Thiazolopyridone ureas as DNA gyrase B inhibitors: optimization of antitubercular activity and efficacy. Bioorg Med Chem Lett 24(3):870–879View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Cooper CB (2013) Development of Mycobacterium tuberculosis whole cell screening hits as potential antituberculosis agents: miniperspectives series on phenotypic screening for antiinfective targets. J Med Chem 56(20):7755–7760View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wagner K, Oehlmann L (1976) Benzothiazol-N-oxide, IV1) Synthese und Reaktivität von 2-Cyanbenzothiazol-N-Oxiden und 2-Benzothiazolcarbonitrilen. Eur J Inorg Chem 109(2):611–618Google Scholar
- Matsumoto M, Hashizume H, Tomishige T et al (2006) OPC-67683, a nitro-dihydro-imidazooxazole derivative with promising action against tuberculosis in vitro and in mice. PLoS Med 3(11):e466View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Tiwari R, Moraski GC, Krchňák V et al (2013) Thiolates chemically induce redox activation of BTZ043 and related potent nitroaromatic anti-tuberculosis agents. J Am Chem Soc 135(9):3539–3549View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Balasubramanian V, Solapure S, Iyer H et al (2014) Bactericidal activity and mechanism of action of AZD5847, a novel oxazolidinone for treatment of tuberculosis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 58(1):495–502View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Landge S, Ramachandran V, Kumar A et al (2016) Nitroarenes as antitubercular agents: stereoelectronic modulation to mitigate mutagenicity. ChemMedChem 11(3):331–339View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Berry MP, Graham CM, McNab FW et al (2010) An interferon-inducible neutrophil-driven blood transcriptional signature in human tuberculosis. Nature 466(7309):973–977View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Bobesh KA, Renuka J, Jeankumar VU et al (2014) Extending the N-linked aminopiperidine class to the mycobacterial gyrase domain: pharmacophore mapping from known antibacterial leads. Eur J Med Chem 85:593–604View ArticleGoogle Scholar