- Research article
- Open Access
Chemical analysis of Greek pollen - Antioxidant, antimicrobial and proteasome activation properties
© Graikou et al 2011
- Received: 11 March 2011
- Accepted: 23 June 2011
- Published: 23 June 2011
Pollen is a bee-product known for its medical properties from ancient times. In our days is increasingly used as health food supplement and especially as a tonic primarily with appeal to the elderly to ameliorate the effects of ageing. In order to evaluate the chemical composition and the biological activity of Greek pollen which has never been studied before, one sample with identified botanical origin from sixteen different common plant taxa of Greece has been evaluated.
Three different extracts of the studied sample of Greek pollen, have been tested, in whether could induce proteasome activities in human fibroblasts. The water extract was found to induce a highly proteasome activity, showing interesting antioxidant properties. Due to this activity the aqueous extract was further subjected to chemical analysis and seven flavonoids have been isolated and identified by modern spectral means. From the methanolic extract, sugars, lipid acids, phenolic acids and their esters have been also identified, which mainly participate to the biosynthetic pathway of pollen phenolics. The total phenolics were estimated with the Folin-Ciocalteau reagent and the total antioxidant activity was determined by the DPPH method while the extracts and the isolated compounds were also tested for their antimicrobial activity by the dilution technique.
The Greek pollen is rich in flavonoids and phenolic acids which indicate the observed free radical scavenging activity, the effects of pollen on human fibroblasts and the interesting antimicrobial profile.
- Proteasome Activity
- Protocatechuic Acid
Bee pollen is a fine powder-like material produced by flowering plants pollen, mixed with nectar and bee secretions  and gathered by the honey-bees. Pollens are the male reproductive cells of flowers and bees' primary food source, containing concentrations of phytochemicals and nutrients and rich in secondary metabolites. During ancient times, people throughout the world used pollen for its medical properties as to alleviate or cure conditions such as colds, flu, ulcers, premature ageing, anemia, and colitis .
In our days, is increasingly used as health food supplements and is currently marketed widely in Europe and Asia as a tonic primarily with appeal to the elderly to ameliorate the effects of ageing. Moreover, in many recent papers the chemical profile of different bee-pollens has been reported [3, 4].
It is known that bee pollen contains lipids, sugars, proteins, amino acids, vitamins, carotenoids, polyphenolics such as flavonoids and carbohydrates . Especially the carbohydrates are derived from the nectar with which the flower pollen has been mixed in the flowers. The phenolic composition of pollen principally consists of flavonol glycosides and of hydroxycinnamic acids . This composition tends to be species-specific [5–8] and has been related to the therapeutic properties (antibiotic, antineoplasic, antidiarrhoeic and antioxidant) of pollen [1, 7–9].
In order to evaluate the chemical composition as well as the biological activities of Greek pollen which has never been studied before, one sample with identified botanical origin of sixteen different common taxa of Greek flora has been investigated.
The proteasome, a non-lysosomal threonine protease, is responsible for the turnover of both normal and damaged intracellular proteins. It has been suggested to serve as a secondary antioxidant mechanism . Once cells are challenged with oxidative stress, the proteasome is activated. It degrades oxidatively and otherwise damaged proteins, thus preventing the formation and accumulation of protein aggregates that in turn have additional deleterious side effects . This complex is critical for the maintenance of cellular viability and may be particularly important for the cell under various conditions of stress, during failure of homeostasis and senescence.
It has been already shown that the proteolytic activities of the proteasome machinery decline during aging in several human tissues as well as in senescent primary cultures . On the other hand, the increased expression of proteasome catalytic subunits leads to increased levels of functional proteasome and in turn, in delay of the appearance of the senescence phenotype. Given the fundamental importance of proteasome function during aging, the aim of this study was to identify natural pollen extracts that induce proteasome activity. A Greek pollen sample was fractionated in three different polarity extracts and their possible proteasome activating properties were tested in human primary fibroblasts. It has been demonstrated that this pollen leads to stimulation of proteasome activities in human fibroblasts. In regard to the different polarity extracts, the water extract was mainly found to induce proteasome activity, thus revealing possible antioxidant properties.
Due to this activity the aqueous extract was selected for further chemical analysis and seven flavonoids have been isolated. Sugars, fatty acids and also phenolic acid and their esters, which mainly participate to the biosynthetic pathway of pollen phenolics, have been also identified from the methanolic and dichloromethane extract. The structural elucidation was determined by modern spectral means 1D- & 2D-ΝΜR and by GC/MS after sample derivatization. The total phenolics were estimated with the Folin-Ciocalteau reagent and the antioxidant activity was determined by the DPPH method while the extracts due to their chemical consistency (rich in total phenolics) and the isolated compounds were also tested for their antimicrobial activity by the dilution technique against nine microbial strains. To the best of our knowledge neither Greek nor any other pollen has been tested before against human pathogenic bacteria and/or fungi.
A wide range of flavonoid types has been determined previously from pollen samples of different geographic origin among which mainly flavones , flavonols , dihydroflavonols and chalcones . Benzoic acid derivatives and hydroxycinnamic acids have been also identified from pollen . Flavonoids are widely recognised as reliable chemotaxonomic markers not only of plants but also of bee pollen and honey. The flavonoids in pollen and honey give special information of geographic and botanical origin of the samples [6, 17] as the flavonoid pattern of each pollen differentiates, in comparison with pollen originality. It is interesting that Cistus bee-pollen contains a large number of flavonoids while other pollens previously analysed contained much fewer . Thus, from almond bee-pollen only methoxykaempferol, quercetin and kaempferol 3-sophorosides were detected  while rosemary bee-pollen contained only quercetin and kaempferol 3-sophorosides . These very distinctive flavonoid patterns support the use of flavonoid analysis in the studies of the botanical origin of bee pollen .
Concerning the studied sample, its microscopical analysis has been resulted to the following 16 different common taxa of the Greek Flora: Papaver rhoeas, Chamomila recutita, Sinapis arvensis, Cistus sp., Trifolium sp., Dorycnium sp., Cichorium sp., Convolvulus sp., Circium sp., Malva sylvestris, Fumaria sp., Eucalyptus camaldulensis, Anemone sp., Ononis sp., Asphodelus sp. and Quercus ilex.
As the Greek studied pollen is a complicated mixture of pellets from sixteen common spring flowering plants, no further correlation between floral origin and structures of isolated compounds can be given.
The methanolic extract was rich in sugars, as well as in fatty acids, fatty acid esters, phenolic acids (p-coumaric acid, ferulic acid, their glycerol esters and glycerol ester of caffeic acid) while the dichloromethane extract afforded fatty acids as linoleic acid, palmitic acid, methyl malonic acid and benzoic acid; fatty acid esters as palmitic acid methyl ester, linoleic acid methyl ester, linolenic acid methyl ester, linolenic acid ethyl ester, stearic acid methyl ester, arachidic acid methyl ester, behenic acid methyl ester, as well as methyl palmitate.
According to literature data, it seems that, in general, the dominant fatty acids present in pollens are: palmitic (C-16), oleic (C-18:1), linoleic (C-18:2) and linolenic (C-18:3) acid [4, 20]. Pollen varies in the relative proportions of fatty acids as well as in their diversity [20, 21]. Fatty acids are important in the reproduction, development, and nutrition of honeybees [20, 22]. Certain fatty acids, such as linoleic, linolenic, myristic and lauric acids, have bactericidal and antifungal properties that are important for colony hygiene [20, 23].
The methanolic extract after derivatization was analyzed through GC-MS and it was found rich in sugars, as well as in fatty acids, fatty acid esters, phenolic acids (p-coumaric acid, ferulic acid, their glycerol esters and glycerol ester of caffeic acid). The sugar content of pollen has been also investigated and the presence of a high content of mannitol as well as of glucose, sucrose and fructose has been reported in accordance with previous studies .
Proteasome activation mediated by aqueous extract of pollen
Proteasome activation by methanolic fraction of aqueous extract fractionation
Total phenolic compound contents of the methanolic extract was found at the value of 10.49 ± 0.3 mg of protocatechuic acid equivalents per gram of pollen which is a value generally lower compared to pollen from Brazil or Arizona [1, 9].
Radical scavenging activity
That the flavonoid/phenolic components must play a significant role in the free radical capacity scavenging of bee pollen is indicated by the observation that the pollens which exhibit the highest activity are those that contain the highest level of flavonoids and phenolic acid derivatives .
Antimicrobial activities (MIC mg/ml) of pollen extracts and their isolated compounds.
CH 2 Cl 2 extract
(2) & (3)
0.1 × 10-3
1 × 10-3
10 × 10-3
1 × 10-3
0.1 × 10-3
1 × 10-3
Bee pollen was collected from the area of Peloponnesus by the end of April 2006 and it was studied microscopically before extraction and analysis.
Pollen chemical analysis
Bee pollen (1 kg) was extracted with solvents of increasing polarities and the extracts were concentrated under reduced pressure to give 6.8 g CH2Cl2 extract, 301.6 g MeOH extract and 244.3 g H2O extract, respectively.
The CH2Cl2 extract was chromatographed through GC-MS to afford fatty acids as linoleic acid, palmitic acid, methyl malonic acid and benzoic acid; fatty acid esters as palmitic acid methyl ester, linoleic acid methyl ester, linolenic acid methyl ester, linolenic acid ethyl ester, stearic acid methyl ester, arachidic acid methyl ester, behenic acid methyl ester and methyl palmitate.
An aliquot (2 μL) of the sample was injected into the gas chromatograph at a split ratio 1:20. The GC-MS analysis was performed using a Hewlett Packard 6890 series II gas chromatograph equipped with an HP-5 capillary column (30 m, 0.25 mm i.d., 0.25 μm film thickness) and a mass spectrometer 5973 of the same company which was operated on EI mode. Helium was the carrier gas at a flow rate of 1 ml/min. For the dichloromethane extract the injector was operated at 200°C and the oven temperature was programmed as follows: 60°C for 5 min, then gradually increased to 280°C with a 3°C/min rate. The identification of the compounds was based on comparison of their retention indices (RI), retention times (RT) and mass spectra with those from Wiley libraries spectra and literature data.
The MeOH extract was derivatised and chromatographed through GC-MS. It appeared rich in fatty acids and their esters as well as in phenolic acids as cinnamic and ferulic acid and their esters. Furthermore, through this chemical procedure, the major sugars were also determined as D-fructose, sorbose, L-altrose, β-D-glucopyranose, α-D-glucopyranose, D-mannopyranose, D-glucitol, mannitol, melibiose, talose, sucrose, maltose and lactose.
The H2O extract was separated through resin (Amberlite XAD-4) to the aqueous-aqueous fraction (aq-aq) and the aqueous-methanolic fraction (aq-meth). The aqueous-aqueous fraction (aq-aq) included the above mentioned sugars which were determined through derivatization procedure and GC-MS analysis.
The aqueous-methanolic fraction (aq-meth) was subjected to MPLC (RP-18 Silica Merck) eluted with H2O/MeOH step gradient to afford 6 fractions (C1-C6). From these fractions through column chromatography on Sephadex LH-20 (Pharmacia) eluted with H2O/MeOH step gradient, and the following flavonoids have been isolated: kaempferol 3-O-rhamnoside (1, 2.7 mg), a mixture of quercetin 3-O-glucoside (2) and quercetin 3-O-galactoside (3) (2.9 mg), quercetin 3-O-rhamnoside (4, 4.3 mg), isorhamnetin 3-O-xylosyl(1-6)glucoside (5, 2.0 mg), 7-O-methylherbacetin 3-O-sophoroside (6, 19.5 mg), and 7-O-methylherbacetin 3-O-glucosyl-8-O-galactoside (7, 1.9 mg) (Figure 1). Their structures have been established by NMR spectra and by comparison with the literature. 1H NMR (400 MHz) and 13C NMR (50 MHz) data were recorded on a Bruker DRX-400 spectrometer and on a Bruker AC200 spectrometer, respectively (using TMS as an internal standard). COSY, HMQC, HMBC and NOESY (mixing time 950 ms) NMR data were performed using standard Bruker micro programs.
Derivatization and GC/MS Analysis of pollen extracts
The MeOH extract was derivatized prior to analysis. For this purpose, about 5 mg of the residue was mixed with 50 μL of dry pyridine and 75 μL of bis(trimethylsilyl)trifluoracetamide (BSTFA) and heated at 80°C for 20 min. The silylated extract was analyzed by GC-MS. An aliquot (2 μL) of the derivatized sample was injected into the gas chromatograph at a split ratio 1:20.
The GC-MS analysis was performed using a Hewlett Packard 6890 series II gas chromatograph equipped with an HP-5 capillary column (30 m, 0.25 mm i.d., 0.25 μm film thickness) and a mass spectrometer 5973 of the same company which was operated on EI mode. Helium was the carrier gas at a flow rate of 1 ml/min. The injector was operated at 200°C and the oven temperature was programmed from 100 to 300°C at a rate of 5°C/min.
The identification of the compounds was based on comparison of their retention indices (RI), retention times (RT) and mass spectra with those from Wiley libraries spectra and literature data.
Antimicrobial activity of the extracts and the isolated compounds was determined using the agar dilution technique . For all assays, stock solutions of the tested extracts were prepared at 10 mg/ml. Serial dilutions of the stock solutions in broth medium (100 μl of Müller-Hinton broth or on Sabouraud broth for the fungi) were prepared in a microtiter plate (96 wells). Then 1 μl of the microbial suspension (the inoculum, in sterile distilled water) was added to each well. For each strain, the growth conditions and the sterility of the medium were checked and the plates were incubated as referred above. MICs were determined as the lowest concentrations preventing visible growth. Standard antibiotic netilmicin (at concentrations 4-88 μg/ml) was used in order to control the sensitivity of the tested bacteria, while 5-flucytocine and itraconazole (at concentrations 0.5-25 μg/ml) as control against the tested fungi. For each experiment, any pure solvent used was also applied as blind control. The experiments were repeated three times and the results were expressed as average values.
A panel of microorganisms, including two Gram positive bacteria: Staphylococcus aureus (ATCC 25923) and S. epidermidis (ATCC 12228); four Gram negative bacteria: Escherichia coli (ATCC 25922), Enterobacter cloacae (ATCC 13047), Klebsiella pneumoniae (ATCC 13883) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (ATCC 227853); as well as three pathogenic fungi: Candida albicans (ATCC 10231), C. tropicalis (ATCC 13801) and C. glabrata (ATCC 28838) were used. Standard antibiotics netilmicin and amphotericin B were used in order to control the tested bacteria and fungi.
Measurement of proteasome parameters
Reagents and antibodies
LLVY-AMC, MG132, as well as primary proteasomal antibodies against β2 (PW8145; 28 kDa) and β5 (PW8895; 23 kDa) subunits were purchased from BIOMOL. Primary antibody against GAPDH (sc25778; 37 kDa) and secondary antibodies were purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology.
Cell lines and culture conditions
HFL-1 human embryonic fibroblasts were obtained by the European Collection of Cell Cultures and were maintained in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEΜ; Invitrogen) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (v/v; Invitrogen), 2 mM glutamine, and 1% non-essential amino-acids (complete medium). HFL-1 cells were subcultured at 37°C, 5% CO2 and 95% humidity, were fed approximately 16 h prior to each assay and cell number was determined in duplicates using a Coulter Z2 counter (Beckman Coulter). HFL-1 cells were subcultured when they reached confluence at a split ratio 1:2.
Proteasome peptidase assays
CT-L proteasome activity was assayed in crude extracts with the hydrolysis of fluorogenic peptide LLVY-AMC at 37°C for 30 min, as described previously . Proteasome activity was determined as the difference between the total activity of crude extracts and the remaining activity in the presence of 20 μM MG132. Fluorescence was measured using a VersaFluorTM fluorescence spectrophotometer (BioRad). Protein concentrations were determined using the Bradford method with bovine serum albumin (BSA) as standard.
Cells were harvested at indicated time points, lysed in reducing Laemmli buffer and proteins were fractionated by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) according to standard procedures . Proteins were then transferred to nitrocellulose membranes for probing with appropriate antibodies. Secondary antibodies conjugated with horseradish peroxidase and enhanced chemiluminescence was used to detect the bound primary antibodies. Equal protein loading was verified by reprobing each membrane with a GAPDH antibody.
Statistics were performed by using Microsoft Excel software. Statistical significance was evaluated using the one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). Results at p < 0.05 or p < 0.01 are denoted in graphs by a single (*) or double (**) asterisk, respectively.
Antioxidant activity by the DPPH test
Chemicals and Standards
DPPH: (2,2-diphenyl-1-picryhydrazyl radical), PCA (protocatechuic acid) and Folin-Ciocalteau's phenol reagent were obtained from Sigma Chemicals Company Ltd. (St. Louis, USA) and sodium carbonate (Na2CO3) was from Merck Ltd, Darmstadt, Germany.
Total antioxidant activity of the methanolic fraction of the aqueous extract and the standard antioxidant BHT was determined by estimation of the % radical scavenging activity by the DPPH test . An aliquot (50 μL) of the extract or the antioxidant standard solution in methanol, containing increasing amounts of antioxidants, was mixed with 1 mL of DPPH solution (70 μΜ in methanol). The kinetics of the decrease of the absorption at 515 nm was recorded in a glass cuvette (1 cm long), after the addition of the antioxidant solution against a methanol blank, until the reaction reached a plateau and the percentage of DPPH· remaining at the steady state was determined as a function of antioxidant concentration. The latter was used to determine the efficient concentration (EC50), that is, the concentration of pollen extract (mg of extract dry matter/mL) necessary to decrease the initial [DPPH·] by 50%. The blank sample consisted of methanol (1 mL) where 50 μL of the corresponding extract were added.
Determination of Total Phenolics
The concentration of total polyphenols in the methanolic fraction of the pollen aqueous extract was estimated with the Folin-Ciocalteau reagent . The procedure consisted of dilution of an aliquot of the extract (up to 100 μL) with water to 600 μL and addition of 60 μL of Folin-Ciocalteau reagent. After 3 min, 120 μL of saturated (35%) Na2CO3 solution was added. The content was mixed and diluted to 1.2 mL with water. The absorbance was measured after 1 hour at 725 nm against a reagent blank. Protocatechuic acid (0-16 μg/1.2 mL) served as a standard for preparing the calibration curve.
Results are expressed as the means ± SD of three replicates.
The Greek pollen is very rich in flavonoids and phenolic acids as it has been shown in this study through the total phenolics as well as through the isolations procedure. This composition indicates the observed free radical scavenging activity and the effects of pollen on human fibroblasts and provides new insights towards enhancement of cellular antioxidant mechanisms by natural products as bee-pollen. Moreover, the interesting antimicrobial profile especially against Gram positive strains together with the other beneficial effects of Greek pollen, which is successfully introduced as a food supplement and can be easily up-taken through normal diet, could ameliorate the effects of ageing and well-being. Especially this latter mechanism, it has to be given careful consideration in the future through further scientific research.
The authors wish to thank Dr S. Karabournioti (Director of the Chemical and Analytical Laboratory of "Attiki" Bee-Culturing Company) for the pollen analysis of our pollen sample.
- Leblanc BW, Davis OK, Boue S, Delucca A, Deeby T: Antioxidant activity of Sonoran Desert bee pollen. Food Chem. 2009, 115: 1299-1305. 10.1016/j.foodchem.2009.01.055.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hanssen M: The healing power of pollen-and other products from the beehive, Propolis, Royal Jelly, Honey. 1979, Wellingborough: Thorsons Publishers LtdGoogle Scholar
- Almeida-Muradian LB, Pamplona LC, Coimbra S, Barth OM: Chemical composition and botanical evaluation of dried bee pollen pellets. J Food Comp Anal. 2005, 18: 105-111. 10.1016/j.jfca.2003.10.008.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Human H, Nicolson SW: Nutritional content of fresh, bee-collected and stored pollen of Aloe greatheadii var. davyana (Asphodelaceae). Phytochemistry. 2006, 67: 1486-1492. 10.1016/j.phytochem.2006.05.023.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Campos MG, Markham KR, Mitchell KA, Proenca da Cunha A: An approach to the characterization of bee pollens via their flavonoid/phenolic profiles. Phytochem Anal. 1997, 8: 181-185. 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1565(199707)8:4<181::AID-PCA359>3.0.CO;2-A.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Markham KR, Campos MG: 7 and 8-O-methylherbacetin-3-O-sophorosides from bee pollen and some structure/activity observations. Phytochemistry. 1996, 43: 763-767. 10.1016/0031-9422(96)00286-5.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Campos MG, Webby RF, Markham KR, Mitchell KA, Cunha AP: Age-induced diminution of free radical scavenging capacity in bee pollens and the contribution of constituent flavonoids. J Agric Food Chem. 2003, 51: 742-745. 10.1021/jf0206466.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Almaraz-Abarca N, Campos MG, Avila-Reyes JA, Naranjo-Jimenez N, Herrera-Corral J, Gonzalez-Valdez LS: Variability of antioxidant activity among honeybee-collected pollen of different botanical origin. Interciencia. 2004, 29: 574-578.Google Scholar
- Carpes ST, Mourao GB, Alencar SM, Masson ML: Chemical composition and free radical scavenging activity of Apis mellifera bee pollen from Southern Brazil. Brazilian J Food Technol. 2009, 12: 220-229. 10.4260/BJFT2009800900016.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Davies KJ: Intracellular proteolytic systems may function as secondary antioxidant defenses: a hypothesis. Free Radical Biol Med. 1986, 2: 155-173. 10.1016/S0748-5514(86)80066-6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Friguet B, Bulteau AL, Chondrogianni N, Conconi M, Petropoulos I: Protein degradation by the proteasome and its implications in aging. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2000, 908: 143-154.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Chondrogianni N, Gonos ES: Proteasome dysfunction in mammalian aging: steps and factors involved. Exp Gerontol. 2005, 40: 931-938. 10.1016/j.exger.2005.09.004.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wiermann R: Phenylpropanoid metabolism by pollen. I. Survey of flavonoid components isolated from gymnosperms and angiosperms. Ber Dent Bot Ges. 1968, 81: 3-16.Google Scholar
- Meurer B, Wiermann R, Strack D: Phenylpropanoid Patterns in Fagales Pollen and Theirphylogenetic Relevance. Phytochemistry. 1988, 27: 823-828. 10.1016/0031-9422(88)84100-1.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wollenweber E, Wiermann R: On the pigmentation of the pollen of Nothofagus antarctica (Forst.) Oerst. (Fagaceae). Z Naturforsch. 1979, 34c: 1289-1291.Google Scholar
- Serra Bonvehí J, Soliva Torrentó M, Centelles Lorente E: Evaluation of Polyphenolic and Flavonoid Compounds in Honeybee-Collected Pollen Produced in Spain. J Agric Food Chem. 2001, 49: 1848-1853. 10.1021/jf0012300.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Tomas-Lorente F, Garcia-Grau MM, Nieto JL, Tomas-Barberan FA: Flavonoids from Cistus ladanifer bee pollen. Phytochemistry. 1992, 31: 2027-2029. 10.1016/0031-9422(92)80355-I.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ferreres F, Tomas-Barberan FA, Tomas-Lorente F, Nieto JL, Rumbero A, Olias JM: 8-methoxykaempferol 3-sophoroside, a yellow pigment from almond pollen. Phytochemistry. 1989, 28: 1901-1903. 10.1016/S0031-9422(00)97883-X.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ferreres F, Ortiz A, Silva C, Garcia-Viguera C, Tomas-Barberan FA, Tomas-Lorente F: Flavonoids of "LaAlcarria" honey. A study of their botanical origin. Z Lebensm Unters Forsch. 1992, 194: 139-143. 10.1007/BF01190185.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Manning R: Fatty acids in pollen: a review of their importance for honeybees. Bee World. 2001, 82: 60-75.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Markowicz Bastos DH, Barth OM, Rocha CI, Da Silva Cunha IB, De Oliveira Carvalho P, Torres EA, Michelan M: Fatty acid composition and palynological analysis of bee (Apis) pollen loads in the states of Sao Paulo and Minas Gerais. Brazil J Apicult Res. 2004, 43: 35-39.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Farag RS, Youseff AM, Ewies MA, Hallabo SAS: Longchain fatty acids of six pollens collected by honeybees in Egypt. J Apicult Res. 1978, 17: 100-104.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Manning R, Harvey M: Fatty acids in honeybee-collected pollens from six endemic Western Australian eucalypts and the possible significance to the Western Australian beekeeping industry. Aust J Exp Agric. 2002, 42: 217-223. 10.1071/EA00160.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Qian WL, Khan Z, Watson DG, Fearnley J: Analysis of sugars in bee pollen and propolis by ligand exchange chromatography in combination with pulsed amperometric detection and mass spectrometry. J Food Comp Anal. 2008, 21: 78-83. 10.1016/j.jfca.2007.07.001.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Huang L, Ho P, Chen CH: Activation and inhibition of the proteasome by betulinic acid and its derivatives. FEBS Letters. 2007, 581: 4955-4959. 10.1016/j.febslet.2007.09.031.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Chondrogianni N, Kapeta S, Chinou I, Vassilatou K, Papassideri I, Gonos ES: Anti-ageing and rejuvenating effects of quercetin. Exp Gerontol. 2010, 45: 763-771. 10.1016/j.exger.2010.07.001.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hanssen M: E for Additives: The Complete E Number Guide. 2002, London: Thorsons Publ. LtdGoogle Scholar
- Loizzo MR, Statti GA, Tundis R, Conforti F, Ando S, Menichini F: Antimicrobial activity and cytotoxicity of Cirsium tenoreanum. Fitoterapia. 2004, 75: 577-580. 10.1016/j.fitote.2004.03.011.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Basim E, Basim H, Özcan M: Antibacterial activities of Turkish pollen and propolis extracts against plant bacterial pathogens. J Food Engin. 2006, 77: 992-996. 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2005.08.027.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Erkmen O, Özcan M: Antibacterial effects of Turkish propolis, pollen and laurel on the spoilage and pathogenic food-related microorganisms. J Med Food. 2008, 11: 587-592. 10.1089/jmf.2007.0038.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Melliou E, Chinou I: Chemical analysis and antimicrobial activity of Greek propolis constituents. Planta Med. 2004, 70: 515-519. 10.1055/s-2004-827150.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Chondrogianni N, Petropoulos I, Franceschi C, Friguet B, Gonos ES: Fibroblast cultures from healthy centenarians have an active proteasome. Exp Gerontol. 2000, 35: 721-728. 10.1016/S0531-5565(00)00137-6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Harlow E, Lane D: Using antibodies: a laboratory manual. 1999, Cold Spring Harbour Laboratory Press, Cold Spring HarbourGoogle Scholar
- Nenadis N, Tsimidou M: Observations on the Estimation of Scavenging Activity of Phenolic Compounds Using Rapid 1,1-Diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) Tests. J Am Oil Chem Soc. 2002, 79: 1191-1195. 10.1007/s11746-002-0626-z.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Gutfinger T: Polyphenols in olive oils. J Am Oil Chem Soc. 1981, 58: 966-968. 10.1007/BF02659771.View ArticleGoogle Scholar